<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Workplace Instant Messaging Etiquette</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.i-think22.net/archives/2009/07/04/workplace-instant-messaging-etiquette/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.i-think22.net/archives/2009/07/04/workplace-instant-messaging-etiquette/</link>
	<description>Now with more rambling</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 01:11:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trisherino</title>
		<link>http://www.i-think22.net/archives/2009/07/04/workplace-instant-messaging-etiquette/comment-page-1/#comment-8700</link>
		<dc:creator>Trisherino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.i-think22.net/archives/2009/07/04/workplace-instant-messaging-etiquette/#comment-8700</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s really only a problem for slow typists. It is pretty annoying to get a &quot;hi&quot; and then have to watch the window for 20-30 seconds waiting for the important bit to turn up. Here&#039;s my 3 step plan for getting the message out faster:

1. Learn to touch type for goodness&#039; sake.
2. Capitalization is for sissies, it just slows you down.
3. Press &quot;enter&quot; liberally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s really only a problem for slow typists. It is pretty annoying to get a &#8220;hi&#8221; and then have to watch the window for 20-30 seconds waiting for the important bit to turn up. Here&#8217;s my 3 step plan for getting the message out faster:</p>
<p>1. Learn to touch type for goodness&#8217; sake.<br />
2. Capitalization is for sissies, it just slows you down.<br />
3. Press &#8220;enter&#8221; liberally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.i-think22.net/archives/2009/07/04/workplace-instant-messaging-etiquette/comment-page-1/#comment-8699</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.i-think22.net/archives/2009/07/04/workplace-instant-messaging-etiquette/#comment-8699</guid>
		<description>whinge whinge whinge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whinge whinge whinge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhys</title>
		<link>http://www.i-think22.net/archives/2009/07/04/workplace-instant-messaging-etiquette/comment-page-1/#comment-8694</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.i-think22.net/archives/2009/07/04/workplace-instant-messaging-etiquette/#comment-8694</guid>
		<description>Perhaps I came off a bit anti-social in my post. There are a few important points that I clearly missed. I remember typing some of these things out, but I was never really happy with the wording (and they felt out of place) so I omitted them. Here they are now for your enjoyment and my vindication.

These rules only really apply to a small subset of IM use. Specifically rule 1 applies to the scenario where someone is asking something of you. It definitely does not apply to casual conversations with friends/coworkers or even an IM meeting.

I&#039;m also not suggesting that we throw out all niceties (which is why I&#039;m still quite happy for the first message to include some sort of greeting). What I would like to see is the overhead of these often 1 question, 1 answer conversations being as low as possible. If someone wants a test review a lower overhead means that I&#039;m reviewing their work quicker, getting to the real heart of what we want to be doing.

IM status goes part-way into giving people an idea of whether you are available or not, but it is too black and white for my needs. I want to be available for conversations and rank their priority on a case by case basis. An essentially empty message makes it hard to determine the priority.

So please, don&#039;t take these rules as an indication I don&#039;t want to deal with your IMs, but rather pointing out a small deficiency in the way we are working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I came off a bit anti-social in my post. There are a few important points that I clearly missed. I remember typing some of these things out, but I was never really happy with the wording (and they felt out of place) so I omitted them. Here they are now for your enjoyment and my vindication.</p>
<p>These rules only really apply to a small subset of IM use. Specifically rule 1 applies to the scenario where someone is asking something of you. It definitely does not apply to casual conversations with friends/coworkers or even an IM meeting.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also not suggesting that we throw out all niceties (which is why I&#8217;m still quite happy for the first message to include some sort of greeting). What I would like to see is the overhead of these often 1 question, 1 answer conversations being as low as possible. If someone wants a test review a lower overhead means that I&#8217;m reviewing their work quicker, getting to the real heart of what we want to be doing.</p>
<p>IM status goes part-way into giving people an idea of whether you are available or not, but it is too black and white for my needs. I want to be available for conversations and rank their priority on a case by case basis. An essentially empty message makes it hard to determine the priority.</p>
<p>So please, don&#8217;t take these rules as an indication I don&#8217;t want to deal with your IMs, but rather pointing out a small deficiency in the way we are working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Cooney</title>
		<link>http://www.i-think22.net/archives/2009/07/04/workplace-instant-messaging-etiquette/comment-page-1/#comment-8693</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Cooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.i-think22.net/archives/2009/07/04/workplace-instant-messaging-etiquette/#comment-8693</guid>
		<description>4. Don&#039;t be affraid to negotiate up - Like how sites do key exchange using public key crypto, but then negotiate up to shared key: this is kind of a follow on to #3, but if as a result of a conversation that started on IM you realize you need to have a much longer or more involved conversation don&#039;t try to keep going with IM.

5. Don&#039;t expect a response immediately - IM is asynchronous. Don&#039;t block waiting for an async call. If you need a synchronous response use a different transport (facemail, voice). Don&#039;t get uppity if you don&#039;t get a response in a &quot;timely&quot; manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4. Don&#8217;t be affraid to negotiate up &#8211; Like how sites do key exchange using public key crypto, but then negotiate up to shared key: this is kind of a follow on to #3, but if as a result of a conversation that started on IM you realize you need to have a much longer or more involved conversation don&#8217;t try to keep going with IM.</p>
<p>5. Don&#8217;t expect a response immediately &#8211; IM is asynchronous. Don&#8217;t block waiting for an async call. If you need a synchronous response use a different transport (facemail, voice). Don&#8217;t get uppity if you don&#8217;t get a response in a &#8220;timely&#8221; manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.i-think22.net/archives/2009/07/04/workplace-instant-messaging-etiquette/comment-page-1/#comment-8692</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.i-think22.net/archives/2009/07/04/workplace-instant-messaging-etiquette/#comment-8692</guid>
		<description>I hardly use IM anymore. I used to use it heaps back in the ICQ days, but for me now it&#039;s just a constant distraction that I do not need. People can email or tweet me (or in an office, come and talk to me) which I find less distracting when I&#039;m trying to work.  For my work contacts I much prefer a quick skype call, than a long, drawn out chat.

It is useful in an office for quickly sending config info &amp; files though (e.g. svn configs...) that&#039;s about it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hardly use IM anymore. I used to use it heaps back in the ICQ days, but for me now it&#8217;s just a constant distraction that I do not need. People can email or tweet me (or in an office, come and talk to me) which I find less distracting when I&#8217;m trying to work.  For my work contacts I much prefer a quick skype call, than a long, drawn out chat.</p>
<p>It is useful in an office for quickly sending config info &amp; files though (e.g. svn configs&#8230;) that&#8217;s about it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OJ</title>
		<link>http://www.i-think22.net/archives/2009/07/04/workplace-instant-messaging-etiquette/comment-page-1/#comment-8691</link>
		<dc:creator>OJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.i-think22.net/archives/2009/07/04/workplace-instant-messaging-etiquette/#comment-8691</guid>
		<description>Hi, (I couldn&#039;t resist)

IM is a medium that people use for many different things. Sometimes I use it to catch up with people because I have no other way of doing so. Sometimes I use it for work-related questions and interactions. It varies.. a lot.

If your post is referring to the case where people are contacting you for work-related queries only, then I only partially agree. If you&#039;re referring to any messages you receive while you&#039;re at work then I almost totally disagree. To say &quot;get to the point or I&#039;m going to get pissed off&quot; is a sure fire way of cutting yourself off from potential contact.

The way I see it is, if you&#039;re signed in with an &quot;available&quot; status, then you&#039;re saying &quot;I&#039;m happy to talk to you if you want&quot;. If you&#039;re not happy to, then sign out or change your status. While online, you&#039;re under no obligation to respond to people if you don&#039;t want to. That&#039;s the beauty of it. If you&#039;re busy, you don&#039;t have to say &quot;Leave me alone I&#039;m busy.&quot;, people understand and appreciate that no response means &quot;I&#039;m busy&quot;.

So I guess what I&#039;m trying to say is be accepting of people&#039;s attempts to make contact. It&#039;s better they start with &quot;Hi Rhys&quot; than not starting at all!

OJ :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, (I couldn&#8217;t resist)</p>
<p>IM is a medium that people use for many different things. Sometimes I use it to catch up with people because I have no other way of doing so. Sometimes I use it for work-related questions and interactions. It varies.. a lot.</p>
<p>If your post is referring to the case where people are contacting you for work-related queries only, then I only partially agree. If you&#8217;re referring to any messages you receive while you&#8217;re at work then I almost totally disagree. To say &#8220;get to the point or I&#8217;m going to get pissed off&#8221; is a sure fire way of cutting yourself off from potential contact.</p>
<p>The way I see it is, if you&#8217;re signed in with an &#8220;available&#8221; status, then you&#8217;re saying &#8220;I&#8217;m happy to talk to you if you want&#8221;. If you&#8217;re not happy to, then sign out or change your status. While online, you&#8217;re under no obligation to respond to people if you don&#8217;t want to. That&#8217;s the beauty of it. If you&#8217;re busy, you don&#8217;t have to say &#8220;Leave me alone I&#8217;m busy.&#8221;, people understand and appreciate that no response means &#8220;I&#8217;m busy&#8221;.</p>
<p>So I guess what I&#8217;m trying to say is be accepting of people&#8217;s attempts to make contact. It&#8217;s better they start with &#8220;Hi Rhys&#8221; than not starting at all!</p>
<p>OJ <img src='http://www.i-think22.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
