Posts Tagged ‘rant’

Workplace Instant Messaging Etiquette

Saturday, July 4th, 2009

I’ve been getting progressively more and more annoyed at the use of Instant Messaging in the workplace. Don’t get me wrong, I think it is a fantastic way to get quick messages across to people and for communicating across boundaries (such as across the other side of the building), but I feel that there are a few rules that should be followed if Instant Messaging is going to be an effective form of communication.

1. If you want something or are asking a question put it in your first message.

Every time I am interrupted by an instant message that just says “Hi” or “Rhys” I scream a little inside. This “handshaking protocol” has broken my concentration and I am now trying to work out what the person wants. I can even see that they are feverously trying to type their actual message. Why waste my previous cycles by forcing me to process a single useless “header” and wait for the actual body. Send the header and the body at the same time!! As an example:

Hi Rhys, do you have time for a quick test review?

This message is concise, expresses the point and can easily be responded to, like so:

I’m busy. Go away.

Ok, in reality it would probably be more like this:

Sure

Or if I really am busy:

Can it wait? I am in the middle of something and should be ready in about 20 minutes.

2. Send complete messages

The last example leads us into the next rule, send complete messages. Don’t leave the recipient of your message guessing. Sure, you can’t answer all possible questions at once, but at least answer the most obvious ones. Empower the person you are communicating with  by giving them the information they need to make a decision so that the conversation can end quickly.

3. Don’t let conversations drag on

If an Instant Messaging conversation is going on too long it is a good indication that the process has broken down. If possible it may be time to get up and speak to the person the old fashioned way. You’ll be able to get more information processed more quickly. If you can’t speak in person, use a telephone or if there is just a lot of information that you need to pass, write an email.

Final words

I’m sure there are more rules that could be applied, but I know that if everyone could follow the first rule I’d be much much happier.

Telstra’s Complaint Process (Part 3)

Friday, February 20th, 2009

Finally the email that provoked a more acceptable response.

Thank you for your reply, although “Our procedure in this type of request is only done through a phone conversation with a consultant” is not actually an explanation.

Referencing your Complaints Policy on your website (http://www.telstra.com.au/contact/complaints.htm) it appears as though email and even post are perfectly acceptable ways to place a complaint. In fact, it even listed a mailing address: Telstra Locked Bag 20026 Melbourne VIC 3001.

I assume that I can send my complaint to this address.
If you insist on asking me to call the customer service hotline again I would like to take the option described under the “If you would like further investigation from Telstra” section of your complaints policy: “If you are not satisfied with the resolution or the investigation of your complaint it will be escalated to the next level of management, or a Case Manager in a specialised customer relations area.”

So yes, I would like this escalated to whatever specialised area is necessary. Being in electronic form it should be straightforward to pass this information on to whatever area necessary (as requested in my original email). I have again attached both of my previous complaint letters to allow you to easily forward my issues on to the relevant areas.

If I receive another canned response (excluding the initial auto responder email) I will be mailing these complaints as well as another covering letter to the address listed on your complaints policy. I will also be contacting the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.

So please take the actions that I have asked and if you personally can not handle it speak to someone who can. Forwarding a complaint to the necessary area should not be a complicated task and should your procedures prevent that may I say that your procedures are in severe need of re-evaluation.

Regards,

Rhys Parry

Telstra’s Complaint Process (Part 2)

Tuesday, February 17th, 2009

When I received an unsatisfactory reply to my first complaint to Telstra I started work on a new scathing reply hoping to get the response I wanted from my first complaint. Unfortunately Telstra’s reply was almost identical.

Hi,

I have attached my original complaint letter in case it has been misplaced.

Thank you for your reply. When I first read it I laughed. Despite the amount of practice you (I’m using the term to collectively refer to Telstra (whom you represent), so please do not take this as a person attack) must have dealing with complaints you don’t seem particularly good at it.

I refer to the first line of my email. That’s right, the first line: “Please redirect this complaint to the necessary area”. Nowhere in my email did I suggest that it would be even a remotely acceptable response to provide telephone numbers where I could presumably read my letter to. In fact, one of these phone numbers was the subject of my fifth complaint (see original letter attached).

Ignoring the first line of my letter is much like “showing a red rag to a bull” or “poking the bear”. More likely these terms are referred to internally as “servicing the customer”.

I chose to send my complaint in writing for the primary reason that it could be forwarded to the appropriate people without losing anything in the translation. This is highly preferable to calling up, telling the whole story only to be passed on to another operator to start all over again.

Perhaps you don’t appreciate the wonders of the written word and its impact on history. Before cavemen started drawing images on the cave wall the only way to pass knowledge was through speech. Once written words were formed there became a means to pass on information without requiring the original author present. Furthermore the communication was able to be passed on exactly as the author intended.

This system was still held back by the amount of time it took to reproduce a written document. Fortunately the invention of the printing press made rapid duplication of a written document feasible leading eventually to increased literacy in the general populace. Several years later, computers were created that could copy information perfectly at high rates. This is where we are today.

I expected that it would be a simple case of locating an email address for the necessary departments and forwarding the email to them. Clearly this must be a new technology that hasn’t yet filtered down to Telstra from the world of academia.

Consequently I hope that Telstra is more familiar with the postal service. Please provide me with the postal address details of each of the relevant heads of department that my letter should be addressed to. Also, please provide the postal details for the head of Bigpond and head of Telstra who I will also send a copy of my letter to. I will be adding an additional covering letter detailing my dissatisfaction of your complaints handling process.

If you can not provide me with this information I would like a full explanation of why this is the case. “We do not provide this information” is not an explanation, nor is “call this number”.

Thank you for your time and I look forward to your prompt reply,

Rhys Parry

Telstra’s Complaint Process (Part 1)

Friday, February 6th, 2009

Recently I’ve had some issues with my Bigpond Cable internet connection. Even more annoyingly I ran into far too many roadblocks while getting it fixed. These roadblocks culminated in a long letter to Telstra listing my grievances.

(Please redirect this complaint to the necessary area)

Hi,

I recently experienced issues with my Bigpond Cable internet connection. The problem was an issue on the street. Despite spending over an hour on the phone trying to explain the situation the service representative who eventually came out was not made aware of any of the information that I had provided your operators despite assurances that they would. Fortunately the service representative that came out was competent enough to investigate and resolve the issue (which was a connector on the street).

So my first complaint is that the information that I provided was not given to the service representative despite assurances otherwise. Either your process is flawed, I was lied to our your operators were incompetent. (Or all of the above).

My second complaint is that it took nearly a week to send a service representative to my home. That length of time is ridiculous and I hope that you work to reduce that time, especially for long-standing customers on the highest level plans who are already paying a premium for your alleged service.

As the outage was going to be so long I requested temporary access to a complementary (free) dial up account. After being shunted between multiple operators I was finally put through to someone who claimed they could help me. Yet in order to set up this free account I was asked what I believe to be very probing questions to check my credit rating (e.g. marital status). Why is this information relevant for a free account? Furthermore, why is this information relevant when I already have an account that I am paying $139.95 a month for? Perhaps your levels of bureaucracy and rolls of red tape complicate this, but to require this information for a free account is absurd. That is my third complaint.

This morning I received notification that my online bill was now ready. When I checked it I was not surprised to see another example of the incompetence of your staff. I was charged for the dial-up account during the period. That is my fourth complaint.

So it seemed necessary to once again inflict the pain of your call centres on my ears. I called the number (13 22 00) as listed on your bill and was answered by a wonderful piece of voice recognition technology. It asked me what I was calling about, I responded “Wrong charge” and it offered me great rates on STD calls. When it asked again it was fortunately able to recognise that it was a billing enquiry. Unfortunately the machine then insisted on getting a phone number, a piece of information that is not relevant to my bigpond bill at all. When I answered “No number” the machine showed its dry sense of humour it listed a series of seemingly random digits and asked if it was correct. Finally I think the machine gave up and I was transferred to what I can only assume to be a living breathing person. Unfortunately the machine was nicer and had more personality. When I explained the situation (the extra charge if you’ve forgotten) she informed me that I had called the wrong number and she gave me a new number to call. This is where my fifth complaint comes in. I asked why I had to call another number as I had called the number printed on the bill. I was beginning to feel like I was still talking to a machine when the operator responded again to call the other number. She had not answered my question at all. I asked to speak to a supervisor and she told me to call the other phone number. It seemed as if your operator was taking cues from the voice recognition system and was stuck in an infinite loop. I asked why she couldn’t put me through and yet again I was told to call the number. When I ask a question I expect it to be answered (and furthermore I expect it to be answered truthfully) even if the answer is “I don’t know”. I hope that honesty isn’t too much to expect from Telstra.

So I finally gave up and called the other number and spoke to a lovely operator who I hope (but I’m not yet convinced) removed the charge from my bill. Finally someone who seemed competent and was friendly. As she had sorted out my billing issue so well I thought I would ask her about another issue that concerned me about my bill, the credit card surcharge (my sixth complaint).

I accept that there is a credit card surcharge for the bill (despite the fact that I’m already paying a premium), but what baffles me most about this charge is that it is charged on the next bill. This leads to an exciting bit of maths known as compound interest (it may be known inside Telstra as squeezing the customer). I’ll use an example to explain what I’m saying.

Let’s say the total of the bill is $100. I pay that by credit card. My next bill includes the credit card surcharge of $0.69 (0.69%), so comes to a total of $100.69. I then pay that by credit card. My next bill has a surcharge of $0.694761 (I’ve listed all the decimal places to emphasise my point). Over time the absolute value of the credit card surcharge gets larger and larger. Although this is a very small amount I believe this to be crooked behaviour and if there isn’t already a law against it there should be. This is a practice I would like to see Telstra stop. If you must charge a credit card surcharge it should be charged at the time of the transaction and be inclusive (and therefore not compound on to the next bill).

Let’s get back to that dial-up account again for my seventh complaint. Naturally I needed to get the access number for the connection (I’d already been given the user name and password). I also wanted to see if there was any additional settings that I might need to configure. Speaking to your technical support person it was a real challenge to just get the access number, but rather I was quizzed on the type of modem, told to click particular buttons, etc. I wasn’t asking how to set up a dial-up account, but rather the information to connect to one. Eventually I was able to convince the operator to go off script and give me just the raw details, but I shouldn’t have to fight to get that. I understand that some people need this extra help, but others don’t and you can make better use of your time (and mine) if your operators take their cues more from the customer than their script.

Finally I’d like to talk about the quality of your dial-up service. Actually I don’t think I can use the word ‘quality’ in that sentence. Your dial-up service and ‘quality’ are miles apart. In case you hadn’t picked up yet, this is the subject of my eighth complaint. It was slow, terribly slow, slower than dial-up should be. Slower than my old 28.8 connection. I was lucky if I could sustain 1KB/s. It was unreliable, packets were dropped constantly and many pages refused to load (including your bigpond homepage which is so bloated it’s painful to use on broadband). How anyone can justify paying for dial-up is beyond me. I hope for the sake of the sanity of your remaining dial-up customers that this is not the norm.

Thank you for getting to the end of this complaint (hopefully you haven’t just skipped to the end) and hopefully you will be able to take some lessons from this to improve your service in the future. I would expect from you a response to each of the eight complaints I have listed above and what you plan to do to improve the service so I do not continue to experience this level of frustration. I don’t believe this is too much too expect from a large organisation such as Telstra and taking this step would go a long way to demonstrating a commitment to customer service and restoring what little faith I have left in your company. I would also expect whatever response you provide to be honest and free of marketing hyperbole.

Thank you for your time,

Rhys Parry

Due to the wonderful boilerplate disclaimer on the bottom of their response I won’t include the actual response, but rather paraphrase the key points.

  1. There was a boilerplate one sentence apology.
  2. They suggested I call their customer service hotline. Ironically this is the number I put in my original email and had issues with the service.
  3. They also gave me a separate phone number to call for my Bigpond specific issues

Most interestingly they seem to have completely missed the first line of the letter which asked for it to be forwarded to the necessary area.

I am currently writing a reply which I shall post soon.

MobileMe is making me angry

Sunday, July 27th, 2008
MobileMe: Another computer is syncing message window

MobileMe: Another computer is syncing

I’ve seen this dialog far too many times today. The only saving grace of this error message is that it doesn’t seem to steal my focus. However it is so huge and in the middle of the screen it is quite probable that it is covering up whatever text I happen to be working on at the time. The fact it needs to remind me of this fact (it just did it again then) so often is just crazy.

But why is it even necessary? Will my world come to a grinding halt if I don’t know that my contacts couldn’t be synced in the background right now? Really? Who cares? Can I do anything about it? No. Clearly MobileMe just wants to point out its inadequacies.

Violet iDisk icon

Violet iDisk icon

Talking about inadequacies, who chose the colour for the background of the iDisk icon. Violet? Seriously? It’s as if they kept the “transparent colour” and forgot to substitute the real one. Come on Apple, you are all about design, but someone screwed the pooch on this one.

And the way MobileMe was installed, as part of iTunes, now that seems a bit unintuitive to me. (Why would a program that plays music have anything to do with keeping my calendar and contacts synchronised).

Of course, when MobileMe is working it seems to live up to some of the “cloud” hype. I finally have my contacts integrated into Outlook (plus the calendar), which is a big plus, or it would be if I put things in my calendar or opened outlook more frequently than once a week (but that’s my problem (or not)).

So hopefully Apple will fix this stupid error message (I’m happy to have a little notify icon flash or something if it really wants to get my attention). Less importantly I hope they change the background colour of the iDisk icon.

And once that’s done maybe we can focus on real problems.